On 12/10/03 9:22 AM, "AcuTab Publications" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recall seeing some comments above SpamSieve in the past, but am afraid > that I don't recall the consensus opinion. Do you folks think it makes a > good addition to Entourage's junk mail filtering capabilities? Major, major thumbs up and it gets better with each release by its attentive author. Entourage's built-in junk filter doesn't come close. The new version looks at the way you're using the application and offers tips to help it work better. For example, I didn't realize that I wasn't having the application look at enough good messages so I had far more spam in my corpus than good messages. As a result I was getting some false positives here and there and therefore had to scan my spam folder every day. As soon as I started SpamSieve 2.1 a box popped up and told me what to set in the prefs so that wouldn't happen. Since 12/9/03 SpamSieve caught 237 spam messages and there was only one false positive and 2 false negatives. I'm sure that will get better as time goes on, but 99% accuracy is nothing to complain about. Best shareware fee I've spent this year. -- Judi Sohn Mom at Home Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.momathome.com -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
