On 5/3/04 12:20 AM, "Barry Wainwright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would you even need the delay? An empty repeat loop should work just as >> well, and no delay needed. > > Because an empty repeat loop thrashes the processor and hogs the system > until it empties. The 1 second delay is a lot kinder to other processes. True, barely, back in OS 8. It actually never took up much of the system, and takes less now. I wouldn't worry about it. Well, maybe it would be interesting to test it out... -- Paul Berkowitz MVP Entourage Entourage FAQ Page: <http://www.entourage.mvps.org/toc.html> AppleScripts for Entourage: <http://macscripter.net/scriptbuilders/> PLEASE always state which version of Entourage you are using - 2001 or X. It's often impossible to answer your questions otherwise. -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
