On 6/4/04 12:23 AM, "Paul Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/3/04 11:57 PM, "Julian Vrieslander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But, considering the priority scheme described above, it is not clear to me >> why there is a benefit to resolving duplicated fonts (that is, turning off >> all but one copy of the fonts I do use). And yet, this is often >> recommended. > > ... The only good reason would be if there were (or to > avoid) some sort of conflict, which basically can only come from the OS 9 > Classic fonts since the OS X fonts behave themselves according to the > user-local-system hierarchy. Perhaps the problems arise if fonts are duplicated within a particular folder (say, ~/Library/Fonts). I'm not sure if having duplicates is possible, since I don't know the details of the naming rules for PS font names, font file names, font families, suitcases, etc. -- Julian Vrieslander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
