Beth: Thanks to you and the others on this thread:
> > From: Beth Rosengard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 18:54:58 -0700 > Subject: Re: Two addresses in one > > On 6/4/04 4:10 PM, "David Cortright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Actually it's probably the mail server that's doing that. The address he >> listed: >> Mary Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> Is not a valid RFC 2822 address, so what happens is undefined and likely >> handled differently by different mail servers. > > Ah! Now I see. Neither I nor Henry picked up on the misformatted > addresses. Sorry about that. > > Henry, if you don't see it by now, the problem is that a comma is separating > the two addresses. They should have had the <address> <address> format, not > <address, address>. > > Beth The mapping of the user-visible Entourage representation to the actual representation for mail operations isn't exactly obvious. How would I know that the comma is or isn't a required address record separator in one or the other? As far as I can remember, I didn't put the comma in. I do recall messing around to get Entourage to get both addresses to "stick" in the address book, but I don't recall the details. It may be coincidental, but the current problem didn't seem to show up until after I installed Office 2004. That said, I believe by now I've sent the same message with the comma separator three times now, and received only one bounce, the one I mentioned. So maybe the problem is really in my mail server. It seems to be a bit flakey with outgoing mail these days... I did remove the comma from the address book entry, and I'll try it again that way. I'll post if I discover anything new. Thanks, Henry [EMAIL PROTECTED] remove 'zzz' -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
