Thanks! I am also a writer, and have written one set of three volumes that
ran to about 1000 pages. I did it mostly in Word 5.1, a number of years ago.
Ulysses sounds interesting enough that I should try it out.

At one point, I switched from Word to Nisus Writer pre-OS X, like you. Loved
the quirky macro language. Move to OS X ended that love affair, and
AppleScript started to replace _some_ of the things I used to do in
Nisus--Mostly using Tex-Edit plus or BBEdit to do the more complex
manipulation. I've purchased Nisus Writer Express, but barely used it. Like
you, I dread having to learn Perl, although I'm sure I will love it once I
find the time to do so. Have you played at all with AppleScripting it? Is
the dictionary fairly robust?


On 11/6/04 7:41 AM, "Mr Tea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This from Allen Watson - dated 6/11/04 6�01 am:
> 
>> I'm curious. What did you migrate to?
> 
> Ulysses and Nisus Writer Express.
> 
> I did most of my word processing with Nisus Writer pre OS X, and felt that
> with the improvements in version 2, it was worth the, er, side-grade fee. I
> use it mainly for correspondence and short documents. The only real downer
> is that I'm having to get to grips with bloody Perl to create some useful
> macros - apart from that it feels like coming home.
> 
> Ulysses is a project management tool for writers, and I love it. I'm up to
> my armpits in a project that currently runs to around 85,000 words, in 23
> sections, each with attendant notes, jottings and research � Ulysses keeps
> all of these within easy reach.
> 
> I became aware of this app (from German developers 'Blue Tech') when it
> received a glowing review in the UK's fortnightly MacUser mag back in
> Februaryish. My project was then about a third of the size, yet keeping it
> all accessible with MS Word as my main writing tool was already becoming
> awkward.
> 
> It won't be everybody's cup of tea because the main writing area is
> resolutely, puritanically, single-mindedly plain text. Any formatting
> options (even as basic as bold or italic) are achieved by marking up the
> text and exporting it. This may sound restrictive, but the developer's
> intention is actually that it should be liberating, allowing the writer to
> focus entirely on the textual content, without all those distracting options
> offered by more fully featured word processors. Took me about a month of
> tooth-grinding to come to terms with the Ulysses way, but now I wouldn't
> have it any *other* way.
> 
> 
> 
> Nick
> pp Mr Tea


--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to