> According to Apple, 256 is the absolute minimum to run OS X. MS also state
> 256 as the minimum system requirement for Office 2004.
> 
> However, I would hate to try and run either OS X or Office in that little
> ram. The smallest _practical_ configuration would be 512mb. Even that would
> be slow. Put in 768mb or 1gb and you will see a dramatic improvement in
> performance.
> 
> Why is it too late to add ram to the iMac? It's still available. You need
> 168pin DIMM PC100 SDRAM - a 512mb chip will cost about �50 in the UK - not
> sure how much cheaper you would get it over there (price based on PC133
> memory which is now cheaper, but will work just as well).
> 
> The 600MHz iMac has 2 ram slots, each can take a 512Mb chip to give you 1Gb
> total. Depending on what you already have installed, buying one 512chip will
> either give you 640mb or 768mb (depends whether your existing 256 is in one
> chip or two). For �50, this will be a huge improvement and will make the
> iMac quite useable with Office 2004. My wife is using Office on an older
> 350Mhz iMac, with 768mb RAM, and it's quite useable still.

We typically have people running Mac OS X and Office 2004 on computers with
anywhere from 384-512 MB, and consider it quite usable. These range from
blue and white Power Mac G3/350s and up. That said, you will get
improvements if you go beyond 512 MB and I wouldn't dissuade anyone from
having more RAM.

I feel that you can over-spec your computer by dumping money into the wrong
or unnecessary components. For example, if you have 512 MB of memory and are
not happy with it, and you want to spend money, it might make more sense to
replace the hard disk with a faster, larger model with more cache. If you
read sites like XLR8YourMac.com et. al., this has been repeatedly shown to
make a difference. (A 600 MHz iMac likely came with a 5400 RPM drive, for
example ... a larger 7200 RPM drive with 8 MB cache could help out. But then
again, so could a newer Mac. You and only you can decide how much money you
want to dump into a 4-5 year old Mac. Personally, I would save for a new
computer.)

For our on-campus clients, we give these guidelines for improving
performance, or picking out the best new Macs for their performance:

<http://www.rit.edu/~wwwits/services/desktop_support/mac/xperformance.html>

The guidelines are based on our experience with Jaguar and earlier versions
of Panther, which of course means we have to reconsider them now that Tiger
is out.


-- 
Jeremy Reichman
Information and Technology Services
Rochester Institute of Technology

--
To unsubscribe:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to