Hey, Bob, I think there should be a Noble Prize for "Tree Hugger of the Year". 
You'd probably get it more than once. You realize of course that such a title 
puts you at odds with the forestry/logging world- because they dislike tree 
huggers more than any other kind of person. After all, for them - trees are 
just a raw material for their more glorious "wood products".

Joe

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 1:27 AM
  Subject: [ENTS] Rejuvenated White Pine Lists


  Will, Dale, Ed, et. al:

       I've begun sifting through my sizable white pine data database to 
organize a new listing of white pine sites in the Northeast that have trees 
meeting any of the following criteria:

       1. Trees 12 feet or more in girth,

       2. Trees 130 feet or more in height,

       3. Trees that earn 1500 or more ENTS points  [(Cir^2*Hgt)/10].

      The list will include up to 3 trees per site: the tallest, the largest 
girth, and the highest point total. Where a particular tree fits more than one 
of those categories, the trees listed for the site will be fewer than 3. If a 
single tree at a site is the tallest and largest in girth, it will consequently 
earn the most points. The site would have only the single tree listed. 

      I'll post the new white pine list to the ENTS list when completed. I hope 
you all and others will join me in maintaining the list. I think the criteria 
is exclusive enough to exclude sites that don't have significant trees. The 
challenge is to decide on what represents a separate site. Maybe we can think 
through a site definition criteria. As an example of what I find myself up 
against, fairly large properties like Mt Tom State Reservation, MTSF, MSF, etc. 
have clusters (sites?) of white pine that are sufficiently separated from one 
another to warrant separate treatment especially if thinking at the stand 
level. MTSF has at least 4 distinct pine areas and one could argue for more. 
However, it is convenient to think of MTSF as a single site. I constantly 
waffle on places like Mohawk. I'm sure Dale has the same concerns with Cook 
Forest State Park. How should we define a site?

  Bob   

       

  


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org

You are subscribed to the Google Groups "ENTSTrees" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to