The issue of genetic diversity raises the issue about "scale". If GD is a 
goal, then at what scale? GD may not exist if looking at a small forest, but 
if considering a county, it  may be very good.

My questioning of the scientific validity of the concept continues until 
there is a way to quantify "forest health". How healthy is any given forest, 
at whatever scale? I'm not sure what Lee meant by "productive"- productive 
in what way? Certainly "species richness" is also based on scale.

I have no idea how academia currently views this concept but I've seen too 
much use of the term in ways that seem bogus. Perhaps more discussion can 
result in developing a solid, scientific definition which will be useful for 
research and management purposes.

I'd like to see the concept of "forest health" but without the term 
"health"- which seems relevant to individual organism, not collections of 
organisms. Life on Earth will survive no matter what we do- in that sense it 
will always be healthy- if health has to do with survival. A new word is 
needed to replace it.

Joe
Forestry videos:
http://vimeo.com/1993866
"A Tale of Two Clearcuts"
http://vimeo.com/2090043
"Uneven vs. Even aged silviculture"

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Beluzo Gary A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 9:19 AM
Subject: [ENTS] Re: Rendezvous Report


> Lee,
>
> I appreciate your clear and concise definition and I would suggest an
> amendment; that the definition explicitly include GENETIC DIVERSITY.
> I know that genetic diversity is implicit in your definition but for
> others this is often poorly understood and understated. There may be
> species richness but without genetic diversity (species complexity)
> how long could this be maintained into the future?
>
> Gary
> On Nov 4, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Lee Frelich wrote:
>
> Bob:
>
> Excellent report.  I just arrived home in MN after stopping in PA
> Sunday evening and at my brothers house in WI Monday night. This is
> not exactly the frigid land you mention--it was over 70 degrees here
> today and yesterday. We are in an unusual November heat wave, and have
> not had snow like that I drove through in PA on the way out to MA.
>
> Here is my definition of forest health that you requested:
>
> A forest is healthy as long as it maintains the productivity and
> species richness (all taxonomic groups) of the pre-European settlement
> forest over time.
>
> Lee
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Introduction
>>
>>
>>
>>             The time has arrived for the 2008 western Mass ENTS
>> rendezvous to be entered into the ENTS record book. Let it be noted
>> that the rendezvous officially commenced on Oct 30, 2008 and ended
>> at the close of November 2nd. We had an informal, if not subdued,
>> gathering, but the event produced some highly significant results.
>> The report below covers the details of the 2008 rendezvous. However,
>> before discussing the particulars, let me note that for October
>> 2009, we are considering switching to <?xml:namespace prefix = st1
>> ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Cook Forest
>> State Park for our ENTS fall gathering. Details will be forthcoming.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> >
> 


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org

You are subscribed to the Google Groups "ENTSTrees" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to