Jenny,
Your topic is entirely appropriate. Not sure of how the subject got switched. Please continue with the path you were on. Your contributions are highly valued. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: "JennyNYC" <[email protected]> To: "ENTSTrees" <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2009 10:25:52 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: [ENTS] Re: Nikon Forestry 550 ENTS, Just curious...Nikon 550 is a popular topic for discussion....but why was the original discussion on deer, hawks, and other fauna in urban environments as well as NYC tree book recommendations changed? I am wondering if this topic is not appropriate for this group so it was changed? The interactions between cities and flora and fauna are fascinating and sometimes quite disturbing to me. Please let me know so I don't start an unsuitable discussion! Thanks... Jenny On Apr 1, 9:01 pm, "Edward Frank" <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob, > > Nice to have you back. I hope things are well? Did my calisthenics idea > help at all? In any case I looked at the Nikon Forestry 550, and it seemed > to do the sin height procedure for things above or below horizontal, but it > was not clear to me that if you measured both a sin top ands sin bottom > measurement for a tree or other object if it did both calculations separately > and adds them together or whether it uses a common baseline for both > calculations. if it passes your test, perhaps I will purchase one. > > Ed --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
