I agree Barry, the qualitative and quantitative documentation of Eastern Native Trees should be the primary focus of this list.
Gary Gary A. Beluzo Professor of Environmental Science SEM Division Holyoke Community College 303 Homestead Avenue Holyoke, MA 01040 413 552-2445 [email protected] "exploring in ecological space and evolutionary time..." On Jun 7, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Barry Caselli <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm sorry, but I think this "discussion" is going nowhere, and I > think it's time for it to end. Neither party is convincing the other > of anything, and the discussion has gone round to the point where > it's right back where it started. Doesn't anyone notice that? People > are posting about trees and those posts are getting lost among all > the responses in this post. > Just my 2 cents. > Thanks. > > --- On Sun, 6/7/09, Steven Springer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > From: Steven Springer <[email protected]> > Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change > and other factors > To: [email protected], [email protected] > Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 3:07 PM > > Mike, Ed, All: > > Here is a link to ~31,000 American Scientists > (http://www.oism.org/pproject/pproject.htm > ) who would disagree with the statement "that any legitimate debate > on the subject of global warming is over"; there is also the > infamous list of 600 World Scientists (UN affiliation) that also > disagree with the Global Warming theory. > > Sorry, as has been noted in previous posts, the Global Warming > theory is not unanimous among "creditable" scientists, nor is the > proof submitted for support able to substantiate the conclusion of > this theory. > > Steve Springer > > From: [email protected] on behalf of Edward Frank > Sent: Sun 6/7/2009 4:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change > and other factors > > Mike, > > I believe that any legitimate debate on the subject of global > warming is over, but you can disagree. I also agree with you and > feel that many of the "solutions" being pushed in Washington are > more for political show than anything. Some may even make things > worse. We should be striving for better emission standards, more > efficient burning, and whatever else can reasonably be done to lower > our environmental footprint, but sending money to third world > countries in order to pollute more is a useless transfer of wealth > that does not accomplish anything but hurting our own economy. > > Ed > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
