Gary and Barry, ENTS, But this discussion has some seriously impressive posts! I only understand parts, but I am really blown away by the amount of knowledge and expertise. My last post was about a pot of mud from a salt marsh...I'm really embarrassed...
Jenny On Jun 7, 10:33 pm, Gary A Beluzo <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree Barry, the qualitative and quantitative documentation of > Eastern Native Trees should be the primary focus of this list. > > Gary > > Gary A. Beluzo > Professor of Environmental Science > SEM Division > Holyoke Community College > 303 Homestead Avenue > Holyoke, MA 01040 > > 413 552-2445 > [email protected] > > "exploring in ecological space and evolutionary time..." > > On Jun 7, 2009, at 9:59 PM, Barry Caselli <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm sorry, but I think this "discussion" is going nowhere, and I > > think it's time for it to end. Neither party is convincing the other > > of anything, and the discussion has gone round to the point where > > it's right back where it started. Doesn't anyone notice that? People > > are posting about trees and those posts are getting lost among all > > the responses in this post. > > Just my 2 cents. > > Thanks. > > > --- On Sun, 6/7/09, Steven Springer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > From: Steven Springer <[email protected]> > > Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change > > and other factors > > To: [email protected], [email protected] > > Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 3:07 PM > > > Mike, Ed, All: > > > Here is a link to ~31,000 American Scientists > > (http://www.oism.org/pproject/pproject.htm > > ) who would disagree with the statement "that any legitimate debate > > on the subject of global warming is over"; there is also the > > infamous list of 600 World Scientists (UN affiliation) that also > > disagree with the Global Warming theory. > > > Sorry, as has been noted in previous posts, the Global Warming > > theory is not unanimous among "creditable" scientists, nor is the > > proof submitted for support able to substantiate the conclusion of > > this theory. > > > Steve Springer > > > From: [email protected] on behalf of Edward Frank > > Sent: Sun 6/7/2009 4:37 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [ENTS] Re: High elevation forest response to climate change > > and other factors > > > Mike, > > > I believe that any legitimate debate on the subject of global > > warming is over, but you can disagree. I also agree with you and > > feel that many of the "solutions" being pushed in Washington are > > more for political show than anything. Some may even make things > > worse. We should be striving for better emission standards, more > > efficient burning, and whatever else can reasonably be done to lower > > our environmental footprint, but sending money to third world > > countries in order to pollute more is a useless transfer of wealth > > that does not accomplish anything but hurting our own economy. > > > Ed --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
