Hey, Will

Omitting the Holly, which was the smallest measured the RHI is 89.1.
That is with 10 trees. This should be the final accurate figure.

JP

On Jan 8, 9:44 am, "Will Blozan" <[email protected]> wrote:
> James,
>
> Another great installment on your local forest. BTW, the Rucker index is
> always the 10 tallest species on the site- looks like you may have used 11?
>
> Will F. Blozan
>
> President, Eastern Native Tree Society
>
> President, Appalachian Arborists, Inc.
>
> "No sympathy for apathy"
>
>   _____  
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of James Parton
> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:20 PM
> To: ENTS
> Subject: [ENTS] Eaton/Julian Forest
>
> ENTS,
>
> Today I continue to explore the forests near my home that surround Lake
> Julian near Asheville NC. I have done a couple of past posts on the forests
> near the lake and following these I will label this section of forest
> section 6.
>
> http://www.nativetreesociety.org/fieldtrips/north_carolina/julian/lak...
> n_park_nc.htm
>
> http://www.nativetreesociety.org/fieldtrips/north_carolina/lake_julia...
> forest.htm
>
> Section 6, is located on a peninsula jutting out into the lake whose base is
> near the EATON plant at the end of Heywood Rd. I entered the woods near the
> plant and first found a nice Holly and big Pitch Pine. While measuring the
> pine which turned out to be a decent 6' 2 1/2" cbh and 97.3 ft tall I
> thought of " Pine Barrens " Barry and thought, " This one's for him ". It
> reminded me of that big one he found recently in the barrens. . Going deeper
> into the forest I noticed several hemlocks. One that was close to 100 feet
> tall was dead and all are in decline, no doubt because of adelgid
> infestation. Also invasive plants were everywhere. Especially tangles of
> Oriental Bittersweet and Engish Ivy had the forest floor carpeted green in
> places. I also found a small Norway Spruce growing here too. Later I found a
> live hemlock at 97.9 feet.
>
> One really big Red Oak was measured. A fused one that split into two trunks
> about 3 feet above the ground. Below the split it measures a whopping 12' 1"
> in girth! The left trunks highest point is 95.1ft and right is 97.2ft tall.
>
> After measuring some more pines and a nice White Oak I ventured into a pine
> dominated part of the forest. I was hoping to find some big White Pine since
> other sites on the lake had yielded some well over 100 feet tall. White Pine
> proved not as numerous here and also not as tall. Of the few I measured,
> they fell just short of the 100 foot mark and none had girths of 10 feet or
> more, unlike some of the WP on other lake sites. Pitch and Virginia pine
> dominate the site here but even here I found none quite 100 feet tall.
>
> Approaching the lake I found the shore covered and surrounded by ice. The
> lake is a cooling lake for the Progress Energy coal-fired plant here and is
> warmer than typical lakes in the area. So warm that they have Tilapia
> stocked in the lake which would die off in the winter in other area lakes.
> This forest is located near the cooling outlet of the plant hence locals
> call it the " hothole " side. Anyway, the warm water causes fog which
> condenses in the cold air and freezes on averything near the lake. The trees
> and bushes often are covered in ice during really cold weather and can be
> really pretty. I have fished many nights and left with ice all over my
> fishing stuff and even my coat! It can be a misty lake.
>
> Overall the trees here are pretty average and I surprisingly found none 100
> feet tall or over. However I only explored not quite half of the peninsula
> and a hundred footer is probably present somewhere. However I believe I got
> a good sampling of the forest. Enough to get a good idea of what is there. I
> got 11 species, enough to get a preliminary Rucker Height Index of 84.91.
> Before factoring in the White Pine as the 11th tree I got 83.81 for 10 trees
> on the site. Still it gives me a good idea of the average canopy height. It
> agrees with what I see here.
>
> Here are the measurements
>
> Species                   CBH                    Height            Spread
>
> American Holly*       2' 1/2"                  43.1'
>
> White Pine*             7' 11 1/2"             96.0'
>
> Red Maple               1' 5"                    41.3'
>
> Pitch Pine*              6' 2 1/2"               97.3'
>
> Eastern Hemlock*    5' 0"                    97.9'
>
> Red Oak*                12' 1"!                  97.2'
>
> White Oak               7' 7 1/2"              87.6'
>
> Tuliptree                  5' 3"                    98.2'              
>
> Black Locust*          3' 11"                  86.2'
>
> WhiteOak*              9' 2 1/2"              93.6'               77' 5" avg
>
> Sourwood               2' 8"                    57.6'                
>
> Pitch Pine              4' 2 1/2"               85.4'            
>
> Virginia Pine*         4' 0'                     88.4'
>
> Sourwood*             5' 6"                    71.1'
>
> Tuliptree*               7' 3"                     99.6'
>
> White Pine            7' 8'                     94.2'
>
> Red Maple*           3' 0"                     63.7'
>
> * Tree used in calculating Rucker Height Index.
>
> Rucker Index 84.91
>
> Red Maples on the site averaged much smaller than the other hardwoods. Only
> Dogwoods and American Holly were smaller and then not by much. I wondered
> why this was so.
>
> This was my first time doing a Rucker index and Avg spread. I think I got it
> right. I thought about not using the American Holly because of it's small
> size compared to the other trees and using just the 10 others but Holly is
> common here and I thought it should be represented.
>
> James Parton

Reply via email to