ENTS,

 

Last week, I was invited to accompany Josh Kelly, Jess Riddle, and Hugh
Irwin on a trip to Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest in Graham County, NC. The
purpose of the trip was spawned by some unusually high LiDAR canopy height
"hits" in fly-over data Josh had been reviewing. The data set included
several hits in the mid to upper 170's and a few over 180'. Past ENTS trips
to JKMF have not located heights of the magnitude indicated by the data
except for some white pines in the upper 160's and mid 170's. A pine
measured by James Parton in 2008 at 176' is the tallest tree known from this
forest relic, and needs a re-visit to substantiate its current condition.
The current LiDAR data does not indicate a tree of such height in the area;
perhaps it has fallen.

 

In general though, most prior trips focused on the "Poplar Loop" in the
productive flats of the lower, heavily visited cove. Canopy heights of
140-165', though impressive, were not exceptional. Thus, the extreme canopy
hits caused quite a stir in us southern Appalachian tree hunters!

 

The main target was a small cove to the south of the famous Poplar Loop
Trail. The LiDAR data indicated a pocket of exceptionally tall and tightly
clustered trees. Josh had seen the area in the summer and was stunned to see
it was not in the old-growth section but an old clear cut near the homestead
of the prior owners of the tract. In the summertime clutter of leaves Josh
was able to substantiate that the trees were indeed tall but would need to
be visited when the leaves were off for best measurements.

 

To get to the cove we proceeded off trail from the Poplar Loop and headed up
a small ravine. At the base of the ravine Jess spotted a fine pignut hickory
10'1" X 141.1' tall. As we progressed further up the ravine I spotted
another pignut of similar size. This one scaled 10'10" X 142.7' tall. The
ravine offered more tall trees; one of the most impressive was another
pignut with perfect form. I shot up in the crown from below and realized it
would exceed 150'- a height that is quite impressive for the species. Jess
zeroed the base as I went upslope to measure the height. WOW! This slender
tree turned out to be 9'10" X 157.5' tall!

 

Jess located a huge snag of a tuliptree that had fallen and the immense bulk
had slid down the slope quite a distance. White ash reached 12'4" in girth
and up to 130.7' tall, and also in this cove were a 14'3" X 166.1' tuliptree
and a 8'6" X 130.1' sugar maple. But stealing the show in the upper reaches
of this cove rimmed with frozen cascades was a large bitternut, 9'2" X
150.3'. Second new species for the site over 150'!

 

Having exhausted the tall tree resources of this small cove, we slide-sloped
with great difficulty over the frozen ground into another small cove. We
found nothing of significance in this one and proceeded on to the "hot
spot". We crested the ridge and WHAM! Shafts of arrow straight tuliptree and
other hardwoods dominated the deep but narrow ravine. There was so much
potential in this dense pocket it was hard to know where to start. We began
by shooting up into the crowns to seek out the tall ones and then consulted
the GPS points for the "hits" of tall canopy we were after. Jess was
exclaiming of straight up laser shots into the young trees of 55 yards
(165')! Jess and I stayed upslope to perform the height routines while Josh
and Hugh measured girth and GPS points of the trees.

 

The LiDar data was filtered to only show points over 160 feet so shorter
trees- even though exceptional for the species- would not even show up. Thus
"hiding" in the tall forests of tuliptree were trees that don't quite make
it as tall but are none-the-less record breaking for the species. This was
the case with the first tree I measured in the hot spot. This was a black
cherry that looked really tall yet was obviously shorter than the tuliptrees
around it. I found a solid sighting position while Josh measured the girth.
Well, this tree shattered the former height record by 11 feet! At 152.2 feet
tall this tree is a new 150 club member!

 

Josh and Hugh would walk in the base of the ravine and state that, according
to the LiDAR data there should be a 175' tree within 10 feet or so. Sure
enough, the LiDAR was dead-on. The 178 foot hit was also dead on, and the
178.1 foot tree is now the tallest tree in JKMF and the second tallest
currently known (The Rucker Tuliptree, formerly 178.2', has died back from
the extreme frost of 2008). In all we measured six tuliptrees over 170' and
there are probably a few more in this one small cove.

 

After detailed measurements of the tallest in the ravine we headed up a flat
cove to check out more hot spots and check out a 175' LiDAR return. On the
way Jess spotted a fine white ash that proved to be of exceptional height.
This tree fell below the 160' threshold but not by much! The 9'10" tree
reached an impressive 157.3' tall. More 170+ tulips were scattered in the
small cove we went up, the tallest 174.5'. Jess measured a cucumbertree to
134.5' and I measured a decent white basswood to 139.7'. In this cove, aside
from the tuliptree, white ash and cherry nothing else made it into the
Rucker Index.

 

We headed down to find the 175'+ point. We used the GPS to get to the spot
yet no tree of that height was found. However, a 135 foot tuliptree was
leaning heavy over a small ravine. Guess what? The leaning tree's top was
~185 feet above the ravine! So, ground-truthing is still a very important
part of the LiDAR process and this error shows that it is certainly not
full-proof. Same happened with a leaning white pine on a steep slope. The
tree was only 149 feet tall but the ground was easily 170 feet below the
top. But, pretty dag-gone awesome to say the least! I was floored at the
height accuracy and the ground placement of the hits. Incredible!

 

We wish to point out that no 170+ LiDAR hits in the old-growth have yet
proven to be legitimate; it looks as though the tallest trees in JKMF are
second-growth. This finding is mirrored in the Smokies and other sites as
well. What is also striking about this site is the impressive Rucker Index
is composed of trees in a very small area. This suggests that there is more
to be found in this impressive forest relic!

 

So, the current Joyce Kilmer Memorial Forest Rucker Index stands at 15#.#:

 

Will F. Blozan

Josh Kelly

Jess Riddle

Hugh Irwin

 

Eastern Native Tree Society

 

Reply via email to