> I'm not sure why folks forget that a roll of 36 exposure film is ALREADY one > incredibly convenient, small an CHEAP memory medium and that your present > and perhaps cheap EOS camera is already a Multi Giga-Pixel camera. Who > needs a limiting 10 MP's? show me a 35mm SLR that allows the user to review the photo that they have just taken, and delete that photo if they do not like it. what about the ability to shot ~1000 photos on one roll? the ability to send the photos back to the office within minutes of them being taken. (assuming one has a laptop and mobile phone). After the initial outlay (which granted is alot compared to 35mm) shooting is essentially free. shooting digital is a different theosophy to shooting 35mm. i do not believe digital is better than 35mm (or vise versa) but that they have different uses, and the end use should dicate the system used. digital = speed, 35mm = quality. digital in many years may catch up on the quality, but it will never overtake 35mm. just for the record i am pro digital, and will get a D30 as soon as the 2nd wave arrives in the UK. I will probably get a D1v next year. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
