Nathan D Burns wrote:
>
> I have a Canon 28-105, 100- 2.0, 28- 2.8
>
> I had a 75-300 not USM Canon and I did not like the picture
> quality or the design at all.
>
> I want to get a zoom to handle the 200 plus range. I want
> crisp pictures.
>
> Please recommend a lens for me to buy.
>
> Nathan D Burns
> Gustine, CA
> Nathanb @writeme.com
>
The 100-300USM is well spoken of, a true ring USM, and the build quality
is far superior to the 75-300, whether it is USM, IS or none of the
above. I'm going to rent that lens this wknd. I rented the 100-400IS
last month, and found it to be fantastic. I want to see if the
difference in price can be justified to my wife, and holder of the purse
strings. If you can afford $1600 or so, the 100-400IS USM is a great
lens.
Skip
--
Shadowcatcher Imagery
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
