>
>Allan Engelhardt also compared the 22-55 to the TS-E 24mm L lens. Of
>course the L lens won, but the difference might surprise you:
>http://cybaea.com/photo/lens-quality.html
>
>Cheers
>Julian Loke
Julian,
I don't think this is the best comparison of an "L" series versus a consumer
grade zoom. While you can see the differences in the web posting you site
and the TS-E clearly wins, no one has ever called the TS-E 24mm a
exceptionally sharp L series lens. It is a specialty lens for getting
moderate sharpness and correct perspective. I have one, and think it is
fantastic for its purpose, but if I want light weight and am not worried
about convergence, I'll throw my cheap Sigma 24mm 2.8 on my camera or in my
pocket and get much sharper images with a faster speed and autofocus to
boot. IMHO, I think it would be best to compare lenses of similar cost and
purpose for sake of decision making. It is an interesting comparison, none
the less.
TTFN, JD
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
