On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:21:21 -0600, you wrote: >You've got the right idea, but a 5.6 wide open is well...a 5.6. It doesn't >get any faster than its' maximum aperture, and THATS the aperture that the >camera has to use to AF. Throw on a TC, and the maximum aperture is one or >two stops slower, i.e. f/8 or f/11. But what about a 2.8 lens not AF-ing well when stopped down to f/8 or slower? That's what I don't get. Isn't that what people have been saying? Maybe I misunderstood. If so, your above explanation makes sense to me. Ken * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4x SF AF Charles Soper
- Re: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4x SF AF Skip
- Re: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4x SF AF Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4x SF... Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamro... Skip
- Re: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with T... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamro... F. Craig Callahan
- RE: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4x SF AF Robins, Stuart R
- Re: EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4x SF AF helen doane
- Re:EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4x SF AF CharlesW99
- Re: Re:EOS 100-300mm f5.6L with Tamron 1.4x SF ... Tim Munro
- EOS Why doesn't my 1.4 50mm or my 2.8 70-20... Paul Prior MD
- Re: EOS Why doesn't my 1.4 50mm or my 2... Jim Davis
- Re: EOS Why doesn't my 1.4 50mm or... Paul Prior MD
