Thanks Braham for your answer.

Based on your reply and other info I have got, I dare to make the
following conclusion "draft". Could you please check if it is
totally wrong or right.

I don't have a single EX550 myself. I'm just considering buying
one or possibly two if I can get this "thumb slave" problem solved.
In normal cases the E-TTL with two flashes could be nice, otherwise
there wouldn't be sense in bying the second EX550 I quess.

So:

To work (with an EOS-3) with two EX550s plus one simple dumb manual
slave flash the settings could/should be the following to avoid
triggering the dumb slave by the 550 pre-flash:

Master 550 (the on-camera flash):
- Manual exposure mode (thus no E-TTL).
- Master/Slave in OFF (?) to get rid of the pre-flash.
- Flash output switch to ON.

Slave 550:
- Manual exposure mode.
- Master/Slave to Slave.
- Flash output switch to ON.

Uncertainty:
- Does the slave 550 trigger without getting a pre-flash if it is
  set to manual exposure mode?
- Does the slave 550 trigger without getting a pre-flash if it is
  set to E-TTL mode (not valid in this case though)?
- Would switching the Master/Slave switch in the master 550 to
  'Master' position enable preflash?

If this works it also means:
- Fully manual flash exposure.
- No remote control on slave EX550 (have to walk then).
- The dumb slave works fine (since no preflash).
- The slave 550 actually works as another "dumb" slave.


>Have you considered triggering the other non speedlight/EX flash from the 
>sync socket via cable as this only fires at time of film
>exposure (as I understand?!).

I will be working in darkness and on water so cables just make
me angry, especially when I need to move one of the flashes
or the camera, alone in a hurry (and it is raining...).

Thanks,
Vesa


>Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:51:50 +0000
>From: Braham Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: EOS Simple (?) slave flash question.
>
> > I've read numerous mails about using simple slave flash
> > units with EX550 in master slave configuration.
> > My understanding is that any preflash triggers the
> > "simple" slave (too early).
> >
>
>yes it does
>
> >
> > I'm now trying to find out if it is possible to use
> > two EX550s (one on-camera and the other not) and an
> > additional "simple" slave flash (thus 3 flashes total)
> > successfully. All flashes in Manual exposure mode.
> >
>
>It is possible, but still with pre flash to trigger the slaves if master 
>set to ETTL.
>If master set to manual also then you're OK but you will need a flash meter 
>to set
>exposure (aperture)
>
> >
> > The camera is EOS-3 in Manual exposure mode as well.
> >
> > 1) Do I still get preflash (for communications between
> > EX550s) if the two EX550s are in "Manual" mode but the
> > on-camera is set to "master" and the other one is set
> > to "slave"?
> >
>
>As above
>
> >
> > I don't even know if I can set anything in the slave
> > if it is set as "slave" or does it get all instructions
> > from the master flash only?
> >
>
>In slave and manual mode the 550s are only triggered from the master, no
>power/exposure info is sent.  However you can set all manual parameters by 
>pressing
>and holding the mode button until you get manual and then multi modes 
>selected whilst
>in slave mode.  you still need manual flash metering though as the slaves 
>only receive
>trigger, no other info.  Bear in mind that all ratio control is available 
>with the
>EOS3.  Have you considered triggering the other non speedlight/EX flash 
>from the sync
>socket via cable as this only fires at time of film exposure (as I 
>understand?!).
>
> >
> > 2) Does the slave EX550 flash if it is set to "M" (Manual)
> > AND the Master/Slave-switch in master-EX550 is set to OFF and
> > the same switch in slave-EX550 is set to "OFF" (or "slave")?
> >   Thus is there any setting when the second EX550 acts as a
> > dumb manual slave only?
>
>I the master is set to off (flash output - not the master/slave switch) it 
>will fire
>the control pre-flash,  This is true in all modes as it will always act as 
>a master if
>set to master - hence pre-flash.  If you set the master/slave switch to off 
>this sets
>separate individual flash units and thus no wireless control at all.
>
>Thus for any sort of master slave control you will need a single master 
>unit and one
>or more slaves.  If a master is active then there will be a pre-flash.
>
>And yes it can be very confusing.  What I strongly recommend is that you 
>wait 'till
>you have finished your current film then with an empty camera body test all 
>the
>possibilities (it is just about possible to see the pre-flash - especially 
>if you
>focus on a close light subject so that main flash isn't too bright.  I 
>still think the
>sync (PC) socket may be your answer, just be careful of metering!!!
>
>Cheers, Braham.
>
> >
> >
> > Maybe this was already answered but I may have missed it.
> > Sorry if so.
> >
> > Vesa
>

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to