> Pierre Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think my first choice goes to the 20mm, but I would prefer the
> zoom if it's as sharp... which it probably can't be.
Hi Pierre,
Surprisingly, the MTF data from Photodo suggests that the
20-35/3.5-4.5 is very similar in optical performance to the
20/2.8
I saw in a local shop that the 20-35 has a flare-cutting diaphgram,
while the 20/2.8 does not. Even the close focussing is not so
different 0.8' for the prime, and 1.1' for the zoom.
I'm tending to favour the zoom, but have not had the opportunity
to shoot through either lens.
Any other thoughts are appreciated.
Cheers
Julian Loke
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
