Pierre Bellavance wrote:
>
> I'm seriously thinking of buying the Canon EF 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS USM lens.
>
> I presently own the Canon 28-135 IS lens.
>
> I've checked the test results on www.photodo.com and wasn't impressed by
> the 3.6 rating and the MTF curves.
>
> The results on http://www.photozone.de seem good, however.
>
> I would like to hear from owners and from people who have tried it (or seen
> pictures made with it) before I jump...
>
> Thanks
>
> Pierre
>
It's a great lens. I think it's sharper at the short end than the
28-135 is at the long end, but I don't have any side by side comparison
shots to back that up. It's pretty heavy, though, if you don't have a
monopod, get one!
Skip
--
Shadowcatcher Imagery
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
