> "Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm seriously thinking of buying the Canon EF 100-400/4,5-5,6L IS USM
> lens. ...
> I've checked the test results on www.photodo.com and wasn't impressed by
> the 3.6 rating and the MTF curves.
Hello Pierre,
Why were you worried that the Canon 100-400 was not "impressive"?
To be fair, you should compare other x-400 zooms tested at photodo:
http://www.photodo.com/
3.6 Canon 100-400 L IS USM
2.6 Sigma 135-400
2.3 Tokina AT-X 80-400
1.2 Tamron 200-400
1.2 Vivitar AF 100-400
0.9 Cosina 100-400
Cheers
Julian Loke
P.S. I have this lens. It is heavy, has weak bokeh, but it is very sharp,
focuses close, and has a two-mode image stabilizer.
For another opinion, see: http://www.birdsasart.com/faq_1-4is.html
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
