Henry,
I was comparing the 20/2.8 to the 20-35/3.5-4.5, not the old 20-35 2.8L lens.
I finally ordered the 20/2.8 from Adorama, because you had none in stock,
and were not expecting them before a few weeks. Sorry... next time...
Thanks.
Pierre
At 16:56 3/9/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>At 10:56 PM 3/4/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>>I had decided for the 20/2.8 because of its closer focusing, at 9.5 inches
>>instead of 13 inches for the 20-35 lens, which gives twice the
>>magnification at 20mm, something like 0.13 instead of 0.07.
>
>AND smaller, AND lighter weight, AND faster, AND less expensive.
>
>regards,
>
>Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
>http://www.bhphotovideo.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
