At 10:56 PM 3/4/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>I had decided for the 20/2.8 because of its closer focusing, at 9.5 inches
>instead of 13 inches for the 20-35 lens, which gives twice the
>magnification at 20mm, something like 0.13 instead of 0.07.
AND smaller, AND lighter weight, AND faster, AND less expensive.
regards,
Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
http://www.bhphotovideo.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
