On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:28:11 -0800, you wrote:

>Ken,
>
>That is a very good site except I trust very few people when it comes to
>tests.
>People always justify what they own by saying how good it is when in fact it
>may
>only be mediocre.  Photodo uses high-end MTF testing equipment and Pop photo
>uses a very sophisticated method of testing.  Both tests agree the 20-40mm
>is 
>very very sharp.  It bests the Nikon 20-35F2.8 (which stinks wide open), and
>
>the Canon EF20-35mm and newer (less sharp too) 17-35mm F2.8.  The only
>downside
>is that AF is slow.  Barrel and pincushion is only slightly more than the
>Nikon 
>but it is better than the Canon and Tokina F3.5-4.5 lenses.  
>
>Peter K


Peter -

I completely agree, and take anything I read there with a grain of
salt.  Sort of like talking to people at a pub.    The only thing that
I figure offsets the self-justification, is that people also seem to
like to show off their superior knowledge by trashing whatever they
don't like!  It's just a tendency indicator, and probably an amateur
one at that.  However, if a sufficiently large number of people either
rave or rant, it will at least get me to look a little closer.  That's
why it's always essential to look at the left column on that site, and
see how many have submitted critiques - which by the way, is just a
multiple-choice online form.

For example, this whole thread has got me seriously considering the
20-40!  I'm just not sure I don't want that extra 3mm of a 17-XX zoom.
I was just in Yosemite shooting with a 28-90mm, and boy I wanted a LOT
more than that 28mm offered for certain scenes!    That's a situation
where you just can't get the perspective you want by adjusting your
position!  Yeah, you could walk backwards for a few miles, but that
gets old, and you'd probably run into a canyon wall anyway!




Ken
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to