I use a Vivitar 100mm f/3.5 macro. It has 1:2 macro range, 1:1 with include life
size adapter. If you can find a copy the 6/98 issue of Popular Photography gave
the lens a really good review. The lens body is all plastic which makes it very
light, but also it gives somewhat of a cheap feel. However, the lens takes great
pictures. Plus it only costs $150.00.
John Mac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been getting into macro lately. I have read up all of the previous
> posts on the board regarding macro and extension tubes.
>
> To start Equipment I currently have is; Elan II, standard 28-80mm f4-5.6,
> and 75-300mm f4-5.6, 420EX Flash and Manfrotto Tripod 055B with 222 joystick
> head. I have the Kenko Extension Tube set on order, the 12mm, 24mm, and
> 36mm.
>
> I would love to have have the canon 100mm 2.8 or the tameron or Sigma
> Macro's but cannot shell out the $650-$1000 at the time.
>
> So, My questions are:
>
> 1. I only have zoom lenses and how will the extension tubes react with these
> lenses and what are the best techniques to use, and what suggestions can you
> make for me to get the most out of my average lenses?
>
> 2. Is it worth buying a canon 50mm 1.8 ($149 Canadian)to use for macro?
> Would this lens be any better optically or just a waste of money since my
> working distance will be quite minimal and I could use my 28-80 at 50mm?
>
> 3. What suggestions do you have, and if I were to upgrade to a lens, new or
> used, without breaking the bank what would it be.
>
> Thanks in advance for your input.
>
> Jmac
> New Brunswick, Canada
>
>
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gary Kaplan Photography
http://www.naturefocus.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
