From: "Robert Meier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well, I don't think that this new 16-35 was introduced
> because of the D30/D1v. As a matter of fact, I would
> think that the 16 vs 17 is more important as a
> marketing thing then anything else. The main reason
> for the 16-35 is probably a simple improvement
> regarding optics, weather-sealing, etc. As far as I
> know the 17-35/2.8 while good was not a master piece
> of optics.
Oh, wait a minute....did I miss something? A new 16-35/2.8 L?
Rumour, announced or available? Approx. price?
Best regards
-Markus
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
