--- Peter Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The result was that the G1 shots were sharper! This despite a less
> than
> ideal close up lens attached
> This also has a comparison between the G1 and film, in the guise of
> Fuji
> Sensia (I think, might have been Provia!), again using the Sigma
> macro.
> Again the G1 is much sharper, though I prefer the tonal quality ofthe
> film
> image.
I have looked at the images. Here are a few comments:
The pictures with the G1 seems to have lots of noise which you can
easily see in the black area.
It's not clear how the camera processes the image before storing it. I
think all of them do some sharpening as standard. On the D30 that might
be avoided by storing it as raw (not sure what the software does when
converting it to another format). On a scanner it depends on the
settings, of course. Even if all do some sharpening it's not sure that
all of them do the same amount of sharpening.
The colors of the film and D30 are more similar then that of the G1.
Robert
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
