> What were your impressions on image quality with the 2X. I have a > 70-200/2.8 and was think of adding a 100-400/IS. But if image quality is > good I might opt to sell the 70-200 non IS and get the IS version > and a 2X > converter.
Darrell - I think you should sell your old lens -- to ME! :-D Seriously, I have been looking for a second-hand 70-200 f/2.8L. I foolishly thought that more than usual would show up in the market with the introduction of the IS version, but that hasn't been the case, at least so far. Several on eBay (usually by sellers with questionable history and almost all overpriced), one in KEH's used department that was not much of a deal, and nothing at B&H. Is the IS version not selling/being supplied well? Are buyers hanging onto their old lenses? Are the old lenses being snapped up as soon as they go on the market. My husband and I agreed that a used 70-200 f/2.8 would be my birthday present. Since my birthday was on September 5, I knew I wouldn't get my present on time, but this is frustrating. :-P Pattie * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
