Michael Fontana wrote:
> I don't see that it could have been shipping damage. The
> packages were in
> very nice shape, and the problems were with the details. It really
> bothered me that the second lens was so dirty. Used lenses look
> cleaner. The first lens could have been bad luck,
> definitely. The second
> lens was inexcusable IMO. On the other hand, the used
> equipment I've been
> getting has been great. I've really noticed Canon has great resale
> value. That's not necessarily good at buying time, but great
> at trade-in
> time. Thanks.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sounds like you are getting used lenses not new lenses. I would get my
money back and go to a reputable dealer like B&H. They also have int'l
market lenses but I know they stand behind their sales.
Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
