E-10 is an incredible battery hog, do not dream about using regular AA's. I used rechargable NiMh's. That makes it bearable and I can fill 256mb card (about 130 pictures with the erased ones) without problem. THis was 1000mA ones, but now I have 1600mA ones.
E-10 and E-20 are not very different except for the additional 1megapixels. They are both slow in writing images to the Compactflash. That and the battery drain are the biggest problems of these camera's. Saying that - the E-10 is a terrific value for the money, imho. The word on dpreview forum is that if you can find a good deal on it, no need to get a E-20. The e-20 is about 30-50 percent more and does not really offer much in terms of extra's. > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 3:40 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: EOS Going digital - G2? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Icoz, Evrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >I would suggest a Olumpus e-10. The response time is really > good, manual > >focusing and zooming is like SLR's. > > > What about the E-20? Is it that much better for the > additional cost? I > hear both are real battery hogs though. > > Gary Russell > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
