Never used Kodak Supra 400. Fuji Superia X-tra 400, the X-tra must be in reference to the size of the grain and the horrid skin tones that are rendered. For 400iso NPH is 10 times better IMHO. But the backside is you need to rate NPH at 320/250.
My $0.02 -Dan Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: > > With all the photogs here I thought I would ask if anyone has compared use > of the Suji Superia X-Tra 400 to Kodak's Supra400 in actual use. I am > curious to learn which actually holds up better in daylight/sunlight. Anyone > try these? > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
