> > Digital benefits (imo):
> > - cheaper to use (meaningful if you shoot a lot)
>
>I think this is wishful thinking. I don't think digital is cheaper than
>film. You'll need a computer of some sort. And a printer. And paper.
>And
>cartridges. Or you can have your digital files output on say, a Fuji
You are correct. You need a computer.
>You also forgot to mention that you can instantly change ISO ("film")
>speeds
>with a digital camera. Very handy.
Yes, it is faster. Now I use two bodies which is handy enough.
>process. When I take the picture, when I process the picture, and when I
>post-process the picture. In a sense, it seems reasonable to pay MORE for
>that type of control - the kind you can't get with a film camera.
Well, I have a slide scanner. So after I have scanned I have all
the same possibilities as digishooters have. And I only need to
scan those photos which are good enough for printing (not that many).
The only reason I see to digitize all photos is the computerized
archiving of them.
Vesa
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
