> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Keep in mind you have the option of getting rid of all your poor > photographs. For me this is significant! I may have (on a good day) 2 > exposures out of 36 I think are worth keeping, yet I have to process > the whole roll (and wait) to find those good ones. With a digital > camera I can shoot and shoot all day and dump everything on my > (already paid for) Mac, and either keep 'me or not. My last trip > coast me $150 in processing and I kept a very small percentage of the > results.
Hi Steve, While digital offers the ability to delete all but the "best" pictures, there's a lesson to be learned from Dirck Halstead's story about Monica Lewinsky. A photo taken 6 months before at a fundraiser was dug out from archives to make the front page of TIME magazine: http://digitaljournalist.org/issue9807/editorial.htm Cheers Julian Loke P.S. Dirck Halstead shoots, and raves about, EOS gear. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
