Hi, In this order:
1- The one with the best photographer behind it. 2- Either the 24-85 or the 28-105, in my opinion. Have you considered the 28-135 IS? This one helps with my first answer above, by preventing motion blur. Pierre At 18:20 2/15/2002 +0400, you wrote: >Hi guys, >One question on , >24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM >28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM >28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 USM >Whish takes better quality photos? >Which lens should I buy? >Sorry for bothering with (probably) already discussed topic, but >(unfortunately) I'm not so rich to waste my money on something that isn't >good. :) >Thanks, >David * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
