Chip Louie (edited):
> Hi All,
> 
> I for one don't rely on the purely subjective nature of the 
> POP Photo lens tests!  Worse yet is the apparent 
> relationship between the advertising dollars spent and 
> the test results, give me a break.

Chip, that is BS and you know it. When they test something they
show the results in numbers. Now their editorial that surrounds 
the test is another story. Even when the numbers show a poor 
performer they always write something to say otherwise. But if you read 
the results in numbers they are correct. They also agree with 
Photodo tests. Now Photodo uses the most advanced Hasselblad
MTF Test equipment. Personally, I think they are the most 
accurate. 
As to other magazines, they may have some slant. CDI seems to
favor Nikon, FOTO and COLORFOTO Zeiss and Leica (after all they
are a German magazine), etc.


> You might just as well use my tests, at least I used more 
> than one sample of each lens over a long period of time.  
> I've used all of the non-macro Canon 50mm lenses, 
> EF 50 1.8, EF 50 1.8II, EF 50 1.4USM and EF 50 1L and bought 
> an EF 50 1.4USM based on my own field tests using transparency 
> film.  IMO, optically the EF 50 1.4USM is the best of the 
> bunch edging out the EF 50 1.8 and EF 50 1.8II which 
> performed identically on film and the EF 50 1L in last
> place overall.  Built quality wise the EF 50 1L is the best 
> built with the EF 50 1.8USM, EF 50 1.8, 
> and EF 50 1.8II following.

Seems what you are saying agrees for the most part with Pop Photo
tests, y'know they are the ones you disagree with. ;-)
You will not see a difference in the 50mm F1.8 i v. II unless you
have exceptionally large prints to compare. The F1.4 will be better
than the F1L at certain apertures since designing a faster lens
forces compromise.  Example, compare a 50mm F1.4 with the Canon 
50mm macro. The slower lens (macro) will be sharper. Another point
I have a 58mm Super Angulon (medium format) with a max of F5.6. 
When I shoot at F8 and F11, there isn't a lens on the planet 
that will beat the results. The downside, I have to use a tripod
or fast film.

Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to