>Why are you looking at digital? I am not a wedding photographer myself, but >I am just curious, having recently spoken to a wedding photographer, who has >rejected digital and is firmly committed to analogue.
Peoples expectations of quality are dropping further and further. One example are people who buy disposables despite having (nominally) better P&S cameras. Or the proliferation of horrible quality 1 hour photo labs. Or the best would be the number of people on rec.photo.35 who talk about "pin-sharp" blow-ups made at Walmart from their disposables. In any case, except for the formal portraits, most customers in the U.S. are not that discerning and would be thrilled by actually sharp photos taken by a 35mm SLR or high-end digital. The cost savings for going digital allow you to take lots of photos and still compete with Uncle Ed with his CoolPix, at least. Karen p.s. Perhaps another good example are the baskets of disposable cameras at weddings with notes attached to them to take photos and drop them off at the end of the day. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
