Chip Louie wrote:
> Hey Bob,
>
> I was just going with the new "L" glass convert's flow. I use both Canon EF
> converters extensively (I own them both), and have also tried a Kenko 1.4x
> side by side with a Canon EF 1.4x. The Kenko yielded images that were
> clearly not as good (apparent sharpness and contrast), when compared to the
> EF 1.4x on film so I bought the Canon converters. Canon's EF 1.4x
> converters are selling very cheaply (about $290), now with the release of
> the EF 1.4 II and EF 2x II converters, what does a Tamron 1.4x go for $200?
> I doubt there is a huge difference in price these days. Used, complete,
> mint condition EF 1.4x converters can be had for about the same amount, why
> buy anything else?
>
> Regards,
>
> Chip Louie
Chip,
My Tamron cost $153 when I bought it a year ago.
Since this picture takin' stuff isn't making me any money I save a buck
when I can. My newest glass is all L, wonder where the old non-USM 100
macro falls, so there are places I don't cut corners.
I am sure that if I was making money with my gear I would buy all Canon.
Hmmmmmm, just thought of something, all my Oly gear that I gave my
grandson was Zuiko.....
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organized people are just too lazy to look for things.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
