Hi Nick, I have the EOS 5 + the 1n. In "dim" light the difference in focusing is great. At 125th/2.0, 800ISO, my EOS 5 won't focus track consistently. (it'll be consistently all over the place). The 1n does it right most of the time.
If you use flash, the 1n will use the focus assist of your flash, the A2 will use the built-in lamp which you cover with your fingers (the bit that isn't already blocked by large lenses & shades) My vote is for the 1n. -Terje > I've found an > EOS-1n used for an extremely reasonable price. But > after doing lots of reading I've been kindof thinking > that my interests would be well enough served by an > A2. That is, until I can afford the 1d. The only > reservation I have about the A2 is it's focus tracking > speed. One of the biggest reasons (and I'm sorry if I > went over the last time) that I'm switching to Canon > in the first place is that my camera cannot focus > track a high school athlete running directly towards > me. So my question is, can the A2 handle this type of > moving subject, or ought I go for the 1n? * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
