Ken Durling wrote: > Then when i got the prints back, many of them were over-exposed, > probably by about a stop. It made me wonder if I should have shot at > the meter's recommended EV, although I realize there are other > possible explanations ofr ther over-exposure.
Ken, I must ask the question. What are the negatives like? Are you sure that it is not just the printing? If there are large dark areas then it may be the automatic printing exposure screwing up. Cheers Keith * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
