Peter, interesting thoughts.
However, both your "Picture taker" and "Image Maker" seem to be more involved in technical aspects of photography. There are also those who don't care about equipment or technique, but who think, "this will look much better at dusk / dawn", or "I wish this scene had a red canoe". And neither one has to do with being or not being a pro. A pro gets the job done (even with a $20 disposable camera if neccessary), and makes a living off of selling his photographs. As long as it sells, the photograph doesn't have to be "good" (whatever that means). On the other hand, in certain areas, e.g. as in Nature Photography, image quality is paramount. Then the question "is this a sharp lens" has to be asked. Lars -- Lars Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] 87GT http://www.larsmichael.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
