>> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=195398
>> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/bokeh.htm >> http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/HMArtls.html >> http://www.trenholm.org/hmmerk/ATVB.pdf > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wow. The difference on the label of the Tide bottle is really > startling. That's not just a sharpness difference. Or is it? The > 300/2.8 1.4 combo looks better all around. Hi Ken, The difference lighting (hard vs soft) makes the comparison difficult to interpret. So, do you think that it was the 300/2.8 or was it the 1.4 that made the sun shine for that photo? :-) Cheers Julian Loke P.S. Can you see the bright-ring bokeh, or is it just my imagination? There is a stronger example of the same effect at the top of this page: http://people.smu.edu/rmonagha/mf/bokeh.html * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
