Hi Everyone I'm still looking for a prime zoom and have heard more bad things about the Sigmas so I've gotten up to the Tokina. Was wondering if anyone had opinions on this one. People seem to like it overall but Some say the first version (Non Pro) withg the rspiinin front element is better while others say the pro is an improvement still others like the Pro 2 but I can't tell the difference between the Pros. Which version is the most desirable optically? I've never had so much trouble picking a lens! 1200 bucks would settle the argument of course!
Also, on a different matter I've seen some Phoenix 2.8 zooms selling cheap. How bad are they? Are the at least usable? Javier __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more http://games.yahoo.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
