So am I correct in assuming that a 35mm desktop scanner, Nikon or Polaroid,with a DPI of 2000-4000 will output a higher resolution image with a greater dynamic range than the Ritz CD or a PhotoCD. My main goal is to optimize 35mm color negatives for printing to a Canon 9000 printer. On 5/4/02 1:38 PM, "Neil K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 9:47 AM -0700 5/4/02, Alan Bell wrote: >> In Los Angeles, there are a variety of places that do Photo CDs. The easiest >> is the local drug store which Makes the CD just after they develop the film >> (whether they do it on premises or send it out). [...] > > Hm. I thought local drugstores usually did consumer-oriented > PictureCD, not the higher-rez PhotoCD. > > - Neil K. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
