I have it. Would buy it again if I didn't have it.
For me, the quality is good and the IS is great. Also USM, FTM. Flare? What flare?
rgds,
IVI.
> Any opinions about this lens ?
> How would you rate it against 28-105/3.5-4.5 USM ?
>
> Photodo has quite rave rating of one giving 3.5 mark (very
> high - almost
> approaching pro glass rank performance), however the
> distortions seem to be
> at high level.
> What about flare control ?
> Generally, would you be given the choice of 28-105/3.5-4.5 and
> 28-135/3.5-5.6 IS what would you take (given similar price
> range of both,
> used in good shape).
>
> Photozone isn't very optimistic giving very conservative
> rating to this lens
> outlining heavy flare and heavy distortions inherent to this glass.
>
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************