> Actually, a 30.6 x 30.6mm, the limiting factor being the diagonal measure. > > While this sounds cool to some, I wouldn't want to give up nearly 6mm of > negative width just to eliminate camera rotation.
There is no way I wan't to change the aspect ratio - I'd have to buy a whole new set of lens hood ;o) Actually, I'm wondering now whether anyone really wants square image files? What is the market? Album covers? For a large / medium square format most of the images get cropped before publication but they have resolution to spare (apologies to D1 owners who *really* believe they surpass that already). 35mm as is is actually a bit wide for most purposes so the loss of a few mm from the edges would be OK for me. Changing the format would be very popular with camera manufacturers though - anything that involves people completely refreshing thier hardware inventory always is ... B * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
