For some reason, I have not received any messages fro the list for over a
week. I posted this message and never saw it posted and, of course, saw no
responses. So please - I'd like to have your input.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find that my normal wide angle of 28-105mm (Canon USM) is no longer wide
enough when connected to my D30. I would love to get the newest Canon wide
angle zoom, but I don't have the admission price. Absent someone giving me
one, I am, for the first time, considering non-Canon glass.
As you can see by the Subject, I am considering the Sigma 17-35mm wide
angle zoom. Its specifications look pretty nice, as it goes from f/2.8-4,
it incorporates aspherical lens elements in the front, as well as rear lens
groups.
It also has internal focusing and an included perfect hood. What I have no
experience with is the HSM drive that is purportedly "almost" as good as
Canon's USM. I must admit that I am spoiled by USM lenses and couldn't
accept anything less than speed and silence.
So my question is - does anyone have some practical experience with this
lens in comparison to the equivalent Canon? How good is the HSM? I have
one experience with a Sigma lens and it was horrible. That's when I swore
to never buy anything but Canon.
Will I be disappointed by this lens' performance or is the top of the line
Sigma equivalent to Canon "L" glass? Thanks for any and all help you can
provide.
Gary Thurlow
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Sigma 17-35 HSM Gary A. Thurlow
- Re: EOS Sigma 17-35 HSM Malcolm Stewart
- Re: EOS Sigma 17-35 HSM Branden R. Williams
- Re: EOS Sigma 17-35 HSM Skip Middleton
