Hi,
Recently I have started to think about the following problem. I own
an EOS 3 and 28-135 IS USM + 75-300 IS USM lenses. I usually take landscape
pictures using only slides (mainly Fuji Provia 100F, 400F ar Velvia). I
20x30 cm paper copies of better pictures. Only very rarely I enlarge to
50x60 cm if a picture is worth it.
I have no experience with other lenses therefore my question. Is it
woth for me to change these lenses? Canon 28-70 2,8 L and 70-200 2,8 L are
rather out of my range (I'd have to spare money for ca. 2 years - but maybe
it's worth?). I thought about Sigma/Tokina 28-70 2,8 APO and Sigma 70-200
2,8 APO or Canon 70-200 4L. After looking at the photodo www site I got an
impression that if not Canon 28-70 2,8L then all the other "short" zooms are
+/- equal to my 28-135 IS. OK maybe a little bit better but lower range and
no IS. Is it right?
Concerning "longer" lens I see a huge difference in rank on photodo
between my 75-300 IS and the others. There is then still a question should
it be Sigma or Canon. Sigma is faster (2,8) and cheaper than Canon (4,0) but
"L" is "L".
Or maybe my lenses are quite ok for an amateur and enlargements till
50x60? Will I notice any difference? Please remember i'm not a pro and make
pictures only for my own satisfaction. So maybe I should stay with my old
lenses.
I would be very gratefull for any help or hint.
Thank you.
Michael
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
