Chip Louie wrote (edited to keep it short): > I don't generally put a lot of stock in any one test or one > example of a lens.
> OBTW, here are some images someone else did that compares > several Canon lenses including the EF 28-135IS, these seem > representative of the EF 28-135IS lens' performance compared > to the Canon "L" class zooms. The images show an obvious > and a less obvious problem with the EF 28-135IS > images, the corners are obviously very blurry even stopped > down and less obvious is that the contrast is lower than with > the "L" zooms. Look at the other images and you can see that > the centers are also less sharp than the "L" zooms compared. > > http://www.pbase.com/image/16730485 > > http://www.pbase.com/image/16730487 > > Not much speculation needed here to see that your very high > opinion and past claim that the EF 28-135 3.5-5.6IS ] > performs as well as an "L" zoom may be somewhat overzealous. -------------------------------------------------------------- Chip, You are contradicting yourself. Forst you say you do not put a lot of stock in one test, then you attempt to change subjects and attack my comments on the 28-135IS Lens. Are you taking lawyer lessons on weekends or what? All I can say is I have the actual slides to back up my claim. My results are enough for me. If I like a lens I use it. Maybe if people concentrated more in the image instead of this BS on resoltion and sharpness we would actually have a list that was useful instead of "is my xxx lens sharp enough?" Geeez. Sometimes it can get to you. Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
