On 20 Aug 2003 at 13:47, Steve Parrott wrote:
> Wow... where did *this* come from all of a sudden? or have I just had
> my head in the sand? I don't remember hearing anything about a 300D
> until now that it seems to be a reality.
Well, unlike the high-end/pro digicam's, the low-end range doesn't
have to be tested in the field, by pro photographers, at pro
sport/news events....so much less chance of rumors to start in the
first place....:))
> What does this do to the 10D? Is the 300D supposed to replace it in
> the Canon lineup, or will both cameras be produced? Haven't made my
> mind up yet if I like the metal look body of the 300D.
The D30 was sold within a year (and replaced way too late), why
couldn't the D10 face the same fate....;))
Nah, there has been an analog 300/500/3000/5000 low-end range around
for quite some time, so the nomenclatura still holds, without
conflicts.
Canon needs 3 levels of digicams just like the analog range, even
though the timing/frequence of successor models must drive the
marketeers crazy....:))
--
Bye,
Willem-Jan Markerink
The desire to understand
is sometimes far less intelligent than
the inability to understand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[note: 'a-one' & 'en-el'!]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
