- --- Tom Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Those decisions aside, has anyone used both of these > and could perhaps > comment on the image quality similarity/differences? > I understand the value > of IS, I'm more interested in the "other" things, > like handling, sharpness, > focusing speed, etc.
Hi Tom I had the 35-350 and I was fully satisfied with it complementing the 20-35 f:2.8 L. But now my bag has the 14mm, the 16-35L, 28-70L, and the 100-400 IS. It's really a weighty bag but the output is better though I'm not so sure concerning the wide zoom. The 35-350 is truly the "all in one" zoom but the 100-400 has better imaging quality and IS! If I can have only one lens my doubt is the new 24-70L or the 35-350? Anyway I'd like the get back my 35-350! Regards Felix * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
